Not a whole lot, I'm afraid. Some may come back, as I did. Others may simply be done playing.

You know, I think these discussions about changing the game are almost as fun as the game itself, sometimes. And I agree with the last two about how great this game has become, and how much it has evolved. Now to get to the criticism: First of all, congratulations for the Dev Team, all improvements...

My wish: Elite Recyclers, and cheaper ECs.

An interesting, but hard to do idea. This could take weeks, months, maybe more to perfect and implement. Plus, the game mechanics are shaky already, let's not add one more cog to get stuck.

Not a bad idea at all...but given this scenario, one could do moonshots infinitely to increase the size of the moon until it reaches a hefty 9.999. Given the current system, it is in my opinion easier to destroy a moon and then do more MS for a bigger moon. I will say that chance is really the deci...

Hmm, this is a good idea. I like it! Good job, Pein.

Before I start, I'm not sure my idea as-is is a good one, but perhaps the playerbase could help me figure it out. I propose that after a moon has been created around a planet, every time a debris field is generated around that planet (or moon) that is large enough to generate a moon, there is a chan...

I agree with Torgard. This thing is way too complex.

I have to oppose this. Maybe for a much higher cost, like 50 Rubies, but for 1 Ruby? No way, and certainly not every three hours. Maybe once a month. Otherwise, it's just a dodge tactic for Moon Destroy missions, which give anyone being hunted a major advantage. Too powerful to be unrestricted.

You know, when I first joined in Speed and X-treme, there were quite a number of inactive players nearby. I think five or six per universe near me were over 100K points, with 30+ mine levels. They were my sole income. Mines are great,but until a player hits 10K or so, mines are useless. They take so...