Why 250 more in Speed and Standard, if I may ask?

Damn it Zorg...give us 750 in Speed too.

The wrote:Damn it Zorg...give us 750 in Speed too.

Agreed, if anything it should be 750 in Speed and 1k in Xtreme since we have faster flight times. Or just make it a uniform 750. -.-

We will review it again anyway after some time. This will not be the final value till final certification. Thread will remain open.

Did you know that sending 5 time less LGs than BCs costs 2 times more on same distance. So basicaly, the difference is 10 times more expensive. Players will go bankrupt if their hit doesn't land!

Reduce the consumption please, otherwise all players who already built LGs can only pay for a massive Fleetsave, since attacking is rather unprofitable

Not sure what is going on , Zorg said is implemented but that is the LGs's data we have now:

Structure points 120.000
Shield Strength 700
Attack Points 2.000
Cargo Capacity 4.500 Units
Base Speed 7.500
Fuel Consumption (Deuterium) 1.250 ( should be 750)

He said in a few hours. Didn't say how many. So far only 45 passed

The wrote:Did you know that sending 5 time less LGs than BCs costs 2 times more on same distance. So basicaly, the difference is 10 times more expensive. Players will go bankrupt if their hit doesn't land!

Reduce the consumption please, otherwise all players who already built LGs can only pay for a massive Fleetsave, since attacking is rather unprofitable

They have already said it will be brought down to 750. In addition, BC are meant to be a cheap ship to launch with high shields, that is its purpose. BS are a great spamming ship and LG are their as the ultimate counter to RIPs. Each purpose will be served, assuming it is not lower too much so as to make BC useless.

IKICKAYOUWASSNOW wrote:

The wrote:Did you know that sending 5 time less LGs than BCs costs 2 times more on same distance. So basicaly, the difference is 10 times more expensive. Players will go bankrupt if their hit doesn't land!

Reduce the consumption please, otherwise all players who already built LGs can only pay for a massive Fleetsave, since attacking is rather unprofitable

They have already said it will be brought down to 750. In addition, BC are meant to be a cheap ship to launch with high shields, that is its purpose. BS are a great spamming ship and LG are their as the ultimate counter to RIPs. Each purpose will be served, assuming it is not lower too much so as to make BC useless.

750 in Xtreme.. try being a fleeter in speed, the fs cost is a *****..

The implementation was delayed because there was controversy in the dev team and I was absent to continue the discussion here.

Point is that KICK has a very good point and this has to do with destroyers. (read his post about it).
I am unsure how much it costs for a big LG fleet to fleet save right now, Pkromm who is using this, can let us know.
The initial idea behind the higher consumption for Standard and Speed was the higher consumption rips have at these universes.

We are also unsure if we should lower the capacity of the ship even more.

Finally, since we are ready to tweak more ships and defenses in order to further balance the game, we should not be much worried about the rest but mainly for the role we picked for LG.

With this being said, I expect your final verdicts on the matter which will influence heavily the final decisions on LG.